top of page
Search

Adopt AI without losing yourself

  • Writer: Michelle Clarke
    Michelle Clarke
  • Jan 22
  • 2 min read

I’m speaking with leaders right now carrying a quiet (or not-so-quiet) unease:AI is accelerating, Davos conversations are linking AI and geopolitics. Geopolitics is shifting how we see power worldwide.


When the narrative turns that big, it’s easy for organizations to swing between two extremes:

  • Rush: “We can’t be left behind.”

  • Freeze: “This is too risky—we’ll wait.”

Neither response is agency. They’re both forms of surrender.


At Next Gen Grit, we’ve been working with a different anchor:

Sovereign AI isn’t just infrastructure. It’s a sovereignty practice.


For governments, “sovereign AI” often means infrastructure: secure compute, data residency, trusted supply chains, national capabilities.


For organizations and humans, sovereign AI also means:

  • Knowing what you will not outsource

    (What must remain a human decision? What is identity-critical? What is values-bound? What cannot become a black box?)

  • Being able to audit what shapes your decisions

    (What data? What model? What incentives? What guardrails? What failure modes? What human sign-off?)

  • Protecting the conditions for good judgment—especially under pressure

    (When speed rises, can you still think? When fear rises, can you still discern?)


This is the real leadership work: not just adopting AI—adopting it without losing yourselves.


Fail fast… without failing your people

“Fail fast” became Silicon Valley shorthand for learning. But in enterprise settings, the stakes are human: trust, livelihoods, safety, reputation.

So we use a more responsible formulation:


Learn fast, with governance—and with a humanity-lens.

That looks like:

  • small experiments with explicit boundaries (data, domain, decision rights)

  • short learning loops with real workflows (not hypothetical demos)

  • clear “stop rules” (what triggers a pause, rollback, or redesign)

  • governance that isn’t a brake—governance as clarifying architecture

Because the question isn’t “Can we deploy AI?”The question is: Can we deploy AI and still trust our own human signals?


In anxious times, your advantage isn’t bravado or avoidance.Your advantage is coherence: human agency + principled governance + learning velocity that infuse your business with human value.


If you’re leading through this moment, I’m curious:Where in your organization do you most need firmer decision boundaries—what you will not outsource?

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page